Well, the ‘short term’ employment continues and that means the taxman and bank manager are happy but the penalty has been a lack of time for things modelling. A two week trip to Gallipoli in June also consumed available spare time but allowed me to cross something off the 'Bucket List', so no complaints there. However, this all means that work on Philip’s Creek has been restricted to cogitating or planning.
What has been focusing the mind of late are the consequences of the sure onset of one's later years and, in particular, the need for at least one more house move. The need to move has been driven by two certainties; declining mobility will push my wife and I to a single storey house, and a declining pension balance will drive a need to take some cash from the value of the existing family home. The time frame for this final upheaval is uncertain but will probably be sometime in the next five to seven years.
However, the thought of embarking on such a major construction, including building over the existing sceniced layout, only to have to dismantle it and perhaps, adapt it to a new layout space has reduced the appeal of my earlier plans. My current thinking is to adopt a more simple approach that will permit some flexibility for further extensions once I have moved house. But what?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff21/dff214eef3501699aa8fd136855eecb763eaa718" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72162/7216205b727b61050041a6190a383846d8157477" alt=""
All of this pushes me towards another simple module using my standard length of 1.8m combined with a hinged access section. It will be crowded but it does offer the flexibility to extend further with minimal disruption once the house move has been completed.
The track plan will probably look something like the one shown below but I have a habit of making minor alterations once I start laying track, so no guarantees.
Now if someone can tell me how I can fit 30 hours into a day, I'd be eternally grateful!