Brad H, in a recent post to his blog (http://armchairmodellerdownunder.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/opinion.html), discussed
some criticisms levelled at a layout featured in the December 2013 issue of
Model Railroader. One of concepts that attracted adverse comment was the idea
of ‘modelling the ordinary’. Brad’s discussion went on to address other issues,
but I realised that the phase ‘modelling the ordinary’ put some context to what
I am seeking to achieve with Philip’s Creek.
As an aside, the contribution of those individuals who photographed
what was ‘ordinary’ at the time and have made these available over the years must
be acknowledged. Without their efforts, modellers
such as myself would have little to work with other than the fragmentary memories
of childhood.
For some, the term 'modelling the ordinary' may seem a disparaging way to describe their pride and joy. However, as I pondered the concept, I realised that I have been doing it for years by implicitly
applying a simple test to determine the ‘ordinary’; what scenic features
are included and what should be excluded. I endeavour to ensure that landscape features,
buildings, the flora and fauna are not so unique as to attract the attention of
an average observer in the late 1960s. For me, this means no grand buildings, no major or
unique engineering features or infrastructure, and geographic features that are
non-specific and generic to the Upper Hunter.
Having said all of this, there are at least two instances
where Philip’s Creek falls short of the criteria that I have just outlined.
Well, that's the intent. Now all that is needed is the courage to start the demolition!

